The other day while listening to the radio a home owner called in regarding his equity, or lack of equity in his home. His argument was that because the real estate market had crashed, resulting in a loss of equity, the government should step in and change the principle of his loan. In other words, the government needs to force the banks to eat the difference between his purchase price and the current market value. While listening to this particular home owner, I wondered if he had purchased a new car. If he had it may have cost hime between $15K to $25K, as everyone knows the minute you drive off the lot, it is no longer worth the purchase price, you are upside down. Would this same radio caller also expect the government to force the bank to eat the difference between his purchase price and the current fair market value of the car as well?
From a strictly emotional point of view one could reason that this makes sense. However, lets look at this from another perspective. If the same home owner/ caller had earned $100K in equity would it be realistic for the for bank to request that he not only pay off his mortgage, but also pay the bank 25, 35 or 50 percent of the profit, after all the bank took the risk on the home buyer?
This radio callers call actually resonates with many potential sellers that I talk to on a regular basis. It is unlikely that the government would ever force banks to re-adjust the principle of home loans. The government has set up programs like HAMP and HAFA to help home owners who need to sell. Though these programs are not available for government backed loans like FHA and VA. The other option for sellers who can not longer afford their homes, due to financial hardships is to sell the home as a standard short sale





